K. D. Patel v. The State of Maharahstra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard. This petition is similar to the disposed of petitions, viz., writ petition Nos. 6086 of 2005 and 3126 of 2006. In the said petitions, this Court has directed:- "In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to deposit in…
- Para 22. In our opinion, this petition can also be disposed of by accepting the request of the petitioner for depositing an amount of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand only) in the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund, and on deposit of such amount, the petitioner shall also…
Judgment
Mr. V. Gangurde h/f Anamika Malhotra for the petitioner. Mr. R. D. Rane AGP for the State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & G.KARNIK,JJ. D.D.D. G.KARNIK,JJ. G.KARNIK,JJ. DATE: AUGUST 16, 2007. DATE: AUGUST 16, 2007. DATE: AUGUST 16, 2007. P.C.P.C. P.C.
Heard. This petition is similar to the disposed of petitions, viz., writ petition Nos. 6086 of 2005 and 3126 of 2006. In the said petitions, this Court has directed:- "In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to deposit in the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund an amount of Rs.20,000/-. The petitioner shall deposit this amount with the 2nd respondent who shall, forward the amount to the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund. The petitioner shall file an undertaking before the 2nd respondent that the vehicle shall not, hereafter, be :2::2::2: piled within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai. The 2nd respondent shall subject to compliance with the aforesaid conditions release the vehicle only for one journey within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai so as to enable the petitioner to take the vehicle outside the municipal limits. "
In our opinion, this petition can also be disposed of by accepting the request of the petitioner for depositing an amount of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand only) in the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund, and on deposit of such amount, the petitioner shall also file an undertaking before the respondent no.2 that the vehicle shall not be plied within the municipal limits of the Greater Mumbai. The respondent no.2 is directed to comply with this order and release the vehicle only for one journey within the municipal limits of the greater Mumbai so as to enable the petitioner to take the vehicle outside the municipal limits.
This order has been passed in respect of vehicle bearing No.DN-09/9264. (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (D.G.KARNIK, J.)
(S.B.MHASE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 16 Aug 2007. The bench was G KARNIK, D D D G KARNIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.