Kalpana Struct-Con Private Limited v. Shah Group Builders and Infraprojects Limited
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition stands disposed of in above terms
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court that the agreement was presented before the Collector of Stamps for adjudication. Appropriate order was passed thereupon and as on today, the petitioner paid the deficit stamp duty, as determined by the office…
- Para 66. In view of the above, Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar is appointed as sole arbitrator. Details of the learned arbitrator are as follows:- Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar 3rd floor, Oval House, (C/o. Chamber of Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate), British Hotel Lane, Nagindas Master Road…
- Para 1010. Petition stands disposed of in above terms. Priya Kambli (MANISH PITALE, J)
Judgment
Mr. Kunal Mehta a/w. Ms. Komal Patel, i/by. J. Nishar and Company for respondent. CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2022 P.C. : . By this petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner has approached this Court for appointment of arbitrator. This is in context of a construction contract executed between the parties, which consists of an arbitration clause, which reads as follows:
16. SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES In the event of any dispute arises between the parties hereto either as regards to the Quality of work carried out or as regards to the interpretation of any of the terms of this agreement or in any other regards whatsoever, then the same shall be referred to a single arbitrator or if the parties do not agree upon the single arbitrator, the disputes will be referred to two arbitrators, one to be appointed by each party. The Award given by such Arbitrator/s shall be final and binding to the parties hereto. The arbitration under this clause will be arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or any statutory modification or re enactment thereof.
In view of the disputes that arose between the parties, the petitioner invoked the arbitration clause by issuing notice dated 5th May, 2022, but, there was no response from the respondent, necessitating filing of the instant petition.
Upon the respondent appearing in the present petition, a preliminary objection was raised on the ground that the contract agreement was not adequately stamped. Hence, this Court had adjourned the matter for final disposal.
In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court that the agreement was presented before the Collector of Stamps for adjudication. Appropriate order was passed thereupon and as on today, the petitioner paid the deficit stamp duty, as determined by the office of the Collector of Stamps. A copy of the certificate issued by the office of the Collector of Stamps is handed over and the same is taken on record and marked ‘X’. In view of the above, the preliminary objection no longer survives.
This Court is convinced that there are indeed disputes between the parties and the matter needs to be sent to an arbitrator. Learned counsel for the rival parties have agreed upon the appointment of Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar to be the sole arbitrator for resolution of disputes between the parties.
In view of the above, Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar is appointed as sole arbitrator. Details of the learned arbitrator are as follows:- Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar 3rd floor, Oval House, (C/o. Chamber of Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate), British Hotel Lane, Nagindas Master Road, Opp. Commerce House, Fort, Mumbai-400001. Mob. No.: 98205 12260
Parties undertake to inform the learned arbitrator about the order passed today, at the earliest.
The learned arbitrator is requested to submit his consent and disclosure statement in terms of Sections 11(8) and 12(1) of the aforesaid Act within four weeks from today to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. The fees of the learned arbitrator shall be in terms of Fourth Schedule of the said Act.
All questions are left open to be decided by the learned arbitrator.
Operative part
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of in above terms
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11(6).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 14 Dec 2022. The bench was MANISH PITALE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.