✦ Bombay High Court · 13 Jun 2022

Parag Ramchandra Tawde v. Maharashtra Housing And Area

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. There shall be an order in terms of the Consent Terms. The Undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted. The Writ Petition to stand disposed of. The Criminal Writ Petition No. 2818 of 2021 and Contempt Petition (L) No. 14830 of 2021 also to…

Judgment

------- Mr. Charanjeet Singh Chanderpal with Ms. Ruchi Rajput, Ms. Kirti Sarode for Petitioners. Mr. M. M. Vashi for Respondents No. 4 to 6. Mr. P. G. Lad with Ms. Sayli Apte and Ms. Prerana Dhoke for Respondent No.1-MHADA Mr. Ajay Khaire for Respondent No.2. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for State. Mr. Akshay Shinde for MMRDA, Mr.Anil Mishra for Respondents No. 7 to 9. Smt. P. H. Kanthari, GP with Mr. Milind More Addl. GP for State. Mr. S. P. Thorat for MHADA in Contempt Petition No. 14830/21. ------- Nikita Gadgil 1 of 2 2 4 & 5. IA 2146-21 in WPL 3701-21 @ CONPWL 14830-21.odt CORAM : A.A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 13TH JUNE 2022 P.C. :

#1. Leave to delete the Petitioner Nos. 6,15,18,19,21 and 27 and Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 7 to 9. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Re-verification is dispensed with.

#2. Learned Counsel for the parties have tendered Consent Terms which is signed by the Petitioners No. 1 to 11 and Respondents No. 4 to 6 and their Advocates. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as Exhibit-X.

#3. There shall be an order in terms of the Consent Terms. The Undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted. The Writ Petition to stand disposed of. The Criminal Writ Petition No. 2818 of 2021 and Contempt Petition (L) No. 14830 of 2021 also to stand disposed of. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.) NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL Digitally signed by NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL 16:48:59 +0530 Nikita Gadgil 2 of 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Interim Application No. 2146 of 2021). ← Search more judgments