Judgment · High Court · 2004
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE SIDE. APPELLATE CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2010 OF 2004 PETITION WRITWRITWRIT PETITION PETITION 4880 OF 1996 NO.NO.NO. 4880 OF 4880 OF IN ------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------- ---------------- Office Notes, Office Memorada orders or directions and Registrar‘s orders. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Court‘s or Judge‘s Orders. Shri Sudhir C. Halli for the petitioner Shri C.R.Sonawane AGP for State V.G. PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR CORAM; CORAM; V.G. PALSHIKAR SMT.RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DESAI, JJ. SMT.RANJANA SMT.RANJANA DESAI, JJ. DTAED; 23RD JULY, 2004. 23RD JULY, 2004. DTAED; DTAED; 23RD JULY, 2004. P.C.P.C.P.C.
#1. C.A. restoration petition allowed. Original petition restored subject petitioner donating Rs. 500/- to the Welfare fund of the Bar Council. ...
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 23 Aug 2004. The bench was V G PALSHIKAR, RANJANA DESAI, RANJANA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.