✦ Bombay High Court

Salim Shamshi & Ors. v. Mr. Shahzaad Siraj Dalal & Anr.

Civil Revision Application No. 456 of 2003B H MARLAPALLE

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr.A.S.Khandeparkar for petitioners. Mr.R.Ghadge for respondents. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. August 09, 2005. P.C. . This civil revision application impugns the 26-6-2003 passed learned Judge Small Causes Court at Mumbai. Interim Notice No.1355of 2003 present petitioners impleaded defendants RAE & R Suit No.355/749 1998 application rejected impugned order. Admittedly cannot challenged revision application section 115 CPC and, therefore, Mr.Khandeparkar, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the revision. . Leave granted with liberty to take out fresh appropriate proceedings against impugned order. The ad-interim relief granted Court 2 order dated 21-7-2003 shall operate for a period of three weeks.

(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision Application No. 456 of 2003). ← Search more judgments