Judgment · High Court · 2006
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 s. 140
Judgment
this Court, the First Appeal against the said order is not maintainable. As the Appeal itself is not maintainable, application for condonation of delay need not be entertained. Accordingly, application is rejected. Consequently, the Appeal also stands dismissed. However, it is clarified that notwithstanding the dismissal of the Appeal, it will be open for the Applicant to adopt appropriate remedy for challenging the impugned Judgment and Order. Judge. Judge. Judge.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 140.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Jun 2006. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.