✦ Bombay High Court · 05 May 2005

Shri. Someshwar Sahakari Sakhar v. Union of India, New Delhi

Writ Petition No. 6119 of 2002F I REBELLO, REBELLO, S P KUKDAY, KUKDAY

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Shri. Someshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Vs. ... Petitioner Union of India, New Delhi. ... Respondents Mr. A.V. Anturkar for Petitioner. Mr.P.M. Pradhan for R. No. 1. Mrs. S.S. Bhende, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 4 to 6. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & S.P.S.P.S.P. KUKDAY,JJ. KUKDAY,JJ. KUKDAY,JJ. DATED : MAY 05, 2005 : MAY 05, 2005 DATED DATED : MAY 05, 2005 P.C.P.C.P.C. . On behalf Petitioner, learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) REBELLO,J.) (F.I. (F.I. REBELLO,J.) KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P. KUKDAY,J.) (S.P.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 05 May 2005. The bench was F I REBELLO, REBELLO, S P KUKDAY, KUKDAY.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 6119 of 2002). ← Search more judgments