✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITON NO. 632 OF 2007 ------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s Memoranda of Coram, orders appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders ------------------------------------------------------ Ms. Tejashri Rane i/by M/s. Law Global for petitioner. Mr. A.S. Shitole, APP for State. Mr. D.G. Dhanure i/by M/s. M.V. Kini & Co. for respondent no.2. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE,J. 10/10/2007. P.C.: . The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of process issued by the learned Special Metropolitan Magistrate in C.C. No. 299/SS/2006 filed by the present respondent no.2-bank. The said order of process dated 8/5/2002 can be challenged by filing a Revision Application under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. which is an equally efficacious remedy. . Hence the petition is disposed with liberty to approach the Sessions Court. (B.H. Marlapalle,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments