✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Oct 2023

Prahladsingh Ramkhilavansingh (Decd) v. Sudhir J. Bhalekar & Anr.

Interim Application No. 2951 of 2021NITIN B SURYAWANSHI

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

Para 11. For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] Shiv

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2951 OF 2021 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.2481 OF 2021 Prahladsingh Ramkhilavansingh (Decd) Through LR Savitri ...Applicant vs. Sudhir J. Bhalekar & Anr. ...Respondents Mr. Bhambwani Asha Mirchumal for the Applicant. Ms. Kavita Arvind Shah for the Respondents. CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. DATED : 25TH OCTOBER 2023 P. C. :

For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] Shiv

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Interim Application No. 2951 of 2021). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Continue researching