✦ Bombay High Court · 21 Mar 2022

Shrikant Radhikisan Navandhar v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

Para 22. The Writ Petitions to stand disposed of in the above terms. (ABHAY AHUJA,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.) Uday.P.Kambli

Judgment

Nirmala Shrikant Navandhar v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Petitioner ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3175 OF 2022 … Anil Govindnarayan Sarda v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Petitioner ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3163 OF 2022 … Sunil Govindnarayan Sarda v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Petitioner ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3167 OF 2022 … Uday.P.Kambli Archana Nrusinhadas Sarda v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Petitioner ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3173 OF 2022 … Sangeeta Laxmikant Sarda v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Petitioner ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3170 OF 2022 … Vijay Madanlal Navandhar & Anr. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Petitioners ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3161 OF 2022 … Anil Govindnarayan Sarda & Anr. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Petitioners ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3159 OF 2022 … Archana Nrusinhadas Sarda & Anr. v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Petitioners ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.3169 OF 2022 (MENTIONED. NOT ON BOARD.) … Shrikant Radhikisan Navandhar & Anr. ...Petitioners v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondent … Adv. Vijay Killedar for the Petitioners. Adv. Vikram N.Walawalkar i/b Adv. Amey C.Sawant for the Respondent- Corporation. AGP. A.A.Alaspurkar, AGP. Kavita N.Solunke, and AGP A.A.Purav for the State. Uday.P.Kambli ... CORAM : A.A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATED : 21 MARCH 2022 P.C.: We direct that the above Writ Petitions be treated as representations of the Petitioners which shall be decided by the Commissioner of the Respondent-Corporation within a period of six weeks from today.

#2. The Writ Petitions to stand disposed of in the above terms. (ABHAY AHUJA,J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.) Uday.P.Kambli

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 3169 of 2022). ← Search more judgments

Judgment

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Continue researching