Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development v. Parvati Vishnu Pavagi & Anr.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2596 OF 2018 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.5441 OF 2018 Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Through Executive Engineer ...Applicant vs. Parvati Vishnu Pavagi And Anr. ...Respondents ….. Mr. Ashish Gabhale, a/w. Mr. Advait Kulkarni, i/b. Jay & Co., for Applicant. Mr. Gaurav Potnis, for Claimants (Respondent No.1). Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP, for Respondent State. ….. CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. DATED : 1st NOVEMBER 2023 P. C. : Heard.
This application for condonation of delay is strongly opposed by learned Counsel for Respondents.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A).
[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.