Aardra Abhay Patil v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. V.M. Thorat for the Petitioners Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondents 1 and 2. F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : CORAM : F.I.F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : REBELLO & R.M.SAVANT, JJ. R.M.SAVANT, JJ. R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 9TH MARCH, 2007 DATED : 9TH MARCH, 2007. DATED : 9TH MARCH, 2007 P.C. P.C.P.C. . Considering similar orders passed in other petitioners by way of interim relief we direct that pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition the respondent authorities are directed to consider the admission to the Post Graduation Course on the basis of his performance in the Common Entrance Test held on 29th January, 2007. With the above observation application disposed of. F.I.REBELLO, J) (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAVANT,J.) (R.M.SAVANT,J R.M.SAVANT,J
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 09 Mar 2007. The bench was F I REBELLO, R M SAVANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.