The Maharahstra State Co-op. Bank Ltd v. Proprietor of M/s.Ankit Traders
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Shri Hanuman Surajmal Zanwar Proprietor of M/s.Ankit Traders ..Respondent ..Applicant Mr. Devasis Mitra i/b.Kishore Nemade for the Applicant. Mr. Prashant Naik, for Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Sale for Respondent No.2. CORAM : : : F.I.F.I.F.I. REBELLO & REBELLO & CORAM CORAM REBELLO & R.M.SAWANT, JJ. JJ. R.M.SAWANT, R.M.SAWANT, JJ. DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007 : 6TH MARCH, 2007. DATED DATED : 6TH MARCH, 2007 The Applicant was a successful bidder at an auction P.C.P.C.P.C. . conducted respondent Nos. 1
In entire caution within 20 16th January,
2007. The respondents amount consequently forfeited earnest money. The Applicant approached 1st Court relief Court’s December,
2006. That application Respondent No.1. The Court granted a direction that the tender process should be completed within three months.
2. What the Applicant today contends before this Court entirely independent action, unconnected Court 1st December,
2006. If Applicant is aggrieved he can file a substantive petition. That will be considered independently. . In the light of that Civil Application disposed of. We make it clear that we have not decided the case of the Applicant on merits. F.I.REBELLO, J) (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAWANT,J.) (R.M.SAWANT,J R.M.SAWANT,J
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Mar 2007. The bench was F I REBELLO, R M SAWANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.