Mrs.Rakhi Raju Thakur v. State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Bail is granted subject to condition that the applicant
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Hence, I pass the following order : i) The applicant-Mrs. Rakhi Raju Thakur shall be enlarged on - 2 - the same bail on which she was enlarged during trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds within a period of six weeks from today.…
Judgment
Mr.P.A.Pol A.P.P. for State Ms Rupali Shinde for the applicant A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: : FEBRUARY 20,2009 DATE : FEBRUARY 20,2009 DATEDATE : FEBRUARY 20,2009 P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
Heard Advocate for the applicant and the learned A.P.P. for State. The applicant is the 3rd accused who has been convicted for the offence under section 8(c) r/w 20(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 The substantive sentence is of R.I. for six months. She has been sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo R.I. for one and half months. The applicant has already undergone sentence for a period of two months and three days. She was on bail pending the trial. Considering the limited duration of sentence and pendency of the old appeals in this court, she is entitled to be enlarged on bail pending the final disposal of the appeal.
Operative part
Hence, I pass the following order : i) The applicant-Mrs. Rakhi Raju Thakur shall be enlarged on - 2 - the same bail on which she was enlarged during trial subject to filing fresh bail bonds within a period of six weeks from today. ii) Bail is granted subject to condition that the applicant will report to the office of Anti Narcotic Cell once in every calendar month till the disposal of the Appeal. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Bail is granted subject to condition that the applicant
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Feb 2009. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.