A) Mafatlal Mangilal Kothari & Anr. v. Narayan Sadashiv Nandgaokar (since
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to applicant paying cost of Rs.10,000/- in Kirtikar Law Library, High Court Mumbai. (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) D.A.ETHAPE P.A. …. 1
Judgment
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1510 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1483 OF 1988 A) Mafatlal Mangilal Kothari And Another ...Applicants Versus Narayan Sadashiv Nandgaokar (since Deceased) S-o Bharat Narayan Nandgaonkar And Ors ...Respondents Mr. Aseem Napheda a/w Mr. Ajay Panicket i/by Ajay Law Law Associates, Advocate for the applicant. None for respondent. CORAM DATE : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. : 25th OCTOBER 2023 ETHAPE DNYANESHWAR ASHOK DNYANESHWAR ASHOK PC. :
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to applicant paying cost of Rs.10,000/- in Kirtikar Law Library, High Court Mumbai. (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) D.A.ETHAPE P.A. …. 1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.