Ranaware v. District Social Welfare
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Application is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned subject to costs of Rs.1000/-. Payment of costs would be a condition precedent. Costs to be paid within two weeks. Failure on the part of appellant to pay costs would result in dismissal…
- Para 33. Application is disposed of. [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [-2-] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLN.NO.214 OF 2008 IN LPA ST.NO.4066 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4140 OF 2007 Shri. Jalindhar Bhouse Ranaware ..Applicant Vs. District Social Welfare Officer and Ors. ..Respondents .... None for Applicant S.K.Chinchalikar AGP for Respondent No.1 S.S.Pakale for Respondent No.2 .... CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND CORAM: J.N.PATEL AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : MARCH 6, 2009 DATE : MARCH 6, 2009 DATE : MARCH 6, 2009 P.C.P.C. P.C.
None for the Applicant.
Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned subject to costs of Rs.1000/-. Payment of costs would be a condition precedent. Costs to be paid within two weeks. Failure on the part of appellant to pay costs would result in dismissal of the application. Letters Patent Appeal be listed in due course.
Operative part
Application is disposed of. [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [J.N.PATEL, J.] [-2-] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.] [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Mar 2009. The bench was V K TAHILRAMANI, N PATEL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.