Vasant Maruti Palkar v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
5th September,
2003. That Exh.5 a Netaji S. Katkar, who, petitioner contends, brother deceased Shivaji Katkar. The 19th July, 2006 conveying favour Chief Executive Officer. Considering disputed questions a Court exercise ordinary jurisdiction. It petitioner proceedings including ventilate his grievance. With the above observation, Writ Petition disposed of. F.I.REBELLO, J) (F.I.REBELLO F.I.REBELLO R.M.SAVANT,J.) (R.M.SAVANT,J R.M.SAVANT,J
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Mar 2007. The bench was F I REBELLO, R M SAVANT.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.