Sripal Jain v. Surekha Jain
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 12 Mar 2007
- Bench
- NISHITA MHATRE, S B MHASE
Outcome
Allowed
objections this civil application is allowed in terms of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. In view of the non compliance of the order passed on 21st December 2006, the matter was dismissed. However, in view of the compliance of the office objections this civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 5(a). Paper book in this appeal…
Judgment
Sripal Jain. ..Applicant. Versus. Surekha Jain. ..Respondent. --- R. T. Lalawani for the applicant. N. Y. Gupte for the respondent. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, JJ. DATE: MARCH 12, 2007. DATE: MARCH 12, 2007. DATE: MARCH 12, 2007. P.C. P.C.P.C.
Operative part
In view of the non compliance of the order passed on 21st December 2006, the matter was dismissed. However, in view of the compliance of the office objections this civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 5(a). Paper book in this appeal is dispensed with in view of the fact that in the Counter Appeal there is paper book. Civil application is accordingly disposed of. (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (SMT. NISHITA MHATRE, J.)
(S.B.MHASE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: objections this civil application is allowed in terms of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 12 Mar 2007. The bench was NISHITA MHATRE, S B MHASE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.