Rayat Shiksh a n Sanst h a, Satara v. Prof. J.S. Ingale & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ROSHAN DALVI, RANJANA DESAI
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. In the circum st a n ce s, it is not possible for this court to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.) (SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
Judgment
Mr.Milind Deshm u k h for petitioner. Ms.N.D.Buch with Mr.Shailesh More for responde nt No.1. Mr.R.G . Ketkar for responde nt No.2. ---- CORAM : SMT.RANJANA DESAI & SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. Dated : 14 th January 200 8 P.C. :
The petitioner is an Education Trust duly registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and also the provisions of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The petitioner has challenged a commu nication dated 22 nd September 2005 based on the Resolution dated 19.8.2005 passed by the Grievance Committee of the 2nd responden t directing the college aut horities to accept the application from the 1 st responden t and sanction his ungra nted leave and salary. The challenge is merely to the commu nication. 2 There is no challenge to the Resolution dated 19.8.2005, which prompted the 2 nd responde nt to address this letter to the Principal the college. Besides, impugned comm u nication was issued as far back as on 22.9.2005.
Operative part
In the circum st a n ce s, it is not possible for this court to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed. (SMT.RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Registration Act, 1908; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.