✦ Bombay High Court · 23 Oct 2023

Machindra Govind Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.

Ia No. 2682 of 2023NITIN B SURYAWANSHI

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to Applicant paying costs of Rs.5,000/- in Kirtikar Law Library, High Court Mumbai. (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) D.A.ETHAPE P.A. …. 1

Judgment

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2682 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1446 OF 2016 Machindra Govind Jadhav (deceased) Thr. Lrs. 1-a) Ramkrushna M Jadhav Versus ...Applicant The State Of Maharashtra And Ors ...Respondents Mr. Sandeep Salunkhe, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for the Respondent-State. ETHAPE DNYANESHWAR ASHOK DNYANESHWAR ASHOK CORAM DATE : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. : 23rd OCTOBER 2023 PC. :

1.

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) subject to Applicant paying costs of Rs.5,000/- in Kirtikar Law Library, High Court Mumbai. (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) D.A.ETHAPE P.A. …. 1

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Ia No. 2682 of 2023). ← Search more judgments