Smt. Vinamala D. Dimble v. Dayanand D. Dimble
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh h/f Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar respondent. This application condonation delay. We heard Mr. R.A.Sawant i/b Vijayrao Kale applicant. This application condoning 49 days. The respondent opposed condonation delay. However, perusal application affidavit, satisfied properly explained. Therefore, condoned. Matter to proceed further.…
Judgment
Smt. Vinamala D. Dimble. Versus. Dayanand D. Dimble. ..Applicant. ..Respondent. --- Mr. R.A.Sawant i/b R.S. Kate and Vijayrao Kale for the applicants. Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh i/b Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar for the respondents. CORAM: S.B.MHASE & S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.B.MHASE & CORAM: S.R.SATHE JJ JJ JJ S.R.SATHE S.R.SATHE JULY 11, 2005. DATE: JULY 11, 2005. DATE: DATE: JULY 11, 2005. P.C.P.C.P.C.
Heard Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh h/f Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar respondent. This application condonation delay. We heard Mr. R.A.Sawant i/b Vijayrao Kale applicant. This application condoning 49 days. The respondent opposed condonation delay. However, perusal application affidavit, satisfied properly explained. Therefore, condoned. Matter to proceed further. Civil application is accordingly disposed of. (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) (S.R.SATHE,J.) :srp/2005/ J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) J.) (S.B.MHASE, (S.B.MHASE,
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 11 Jul 2005. The bench was S R SATHE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.