✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

Civil Application No. 5722 of 2005S B DESHMUKH

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

First Appeal Delay explained Civil Application. Court. no.3 According Applicant, amount Rs.25,000/- deposited Trial Court. Receipt directed receipt. available Counsel and, therefore, learned Applicant Applicant Receipt handed Advocate 23rd December,

2004.The Appeal thereafter Court. learned Counsel Applicant The receipt bearing No.732 issued Tribunal favour Applicant amount Rs.25,000/- deposited 7th December,2004 in M.A.C.P.No.907 of

1998. 3] I have also perused the order passed by this Court on 18th January,

2005. 4] Case for condonation of delay established. However, Applicant deposit amount Rs. 25,000/- towards statutory deposit, accordance Section 173 the Motor Vehicles Act, this Court, within a period of four weeks from today. 5] In the result, the Civil Application allowed disposed accordingly. Delay 27 filing Appeal condoned. Applicant directed deposit The amount Rs. 25,000/- towards statutory deposit within a period Court. In failure Applicant deposit amount Rs.25,000/-, Appeal Applicant shall stand dismissed without reference to this Court. [S.B.DESHMUKH,J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH,J.]

[S.B.DESHMUKH,J.]

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 5722 of 2005). ← Search more judgments