✦ Bombay High Court · 11 Mar 2022

Judgment · High Court · 2022

Writ Petition No. 2769 of 2022G A SANAP, SUNIL B SHUKRE

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. We further direct that in case approval to the appointment of the Petitioner is granted, name of the Petitioner shall be entered in Shalarth System by Respondent Nos. 4 and the Petitioner shall be allotted Shalarth ID and paid salary with admissible arrears within…

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2769 OF 2022 Shri. Vilas Tukaram Kamble v/s. The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors. Mr. Prashant Bhavake, for the Petitioner. …. .. .. Petitioner Respondents Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP, for Respondent State. …. CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE & G.A. SANAP, JJ. DATE : 11 MARCH 2022 P.C:- Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. There is no need to issue any notice to Respondent Nos. 6 and 7, as the limited relief claimed in the petition is only against Respondent No.4.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of parties.

3.

Respondent No.4 is directed to decide the proposal dated 1 of 2 20 May 2014, sent to him by Respondent Nos. 6 and 7, seeking approval to the appointment of the Petitioner to the post of Laboratory Assistant, in accordance with law, and at the earliest, in any case, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

4.

We further direct that in case approval to the appointment of the Petitioner is granted, name of the Petitioner shall be entered in Shalarth System by Respondent Nos. 4 and the Petitioner shall be allotted Shalarth ID and paid salary with admissible arrears within a period of four weeks from the date of the approval.

5.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs. (G.A. SANAP, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) 2 of 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2769 of 2022). ← Search more judgments