✦ Bombay High Court · 07 Oct 2022

Rohan Fedix D Costa v. The State Of Maharashtra

Writ Petition No. 37 of 2019MILIND N JADHAV, A S GADKARI

Judgment

None for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 7th OCTOBER, 2022. P.C.:- 1) By the present Petition, Petitioner has prayed that his trial i.e. MCOC Special Case No.9 of 2008 may be directed to be expedited and be conducted on day-to-day basis. It is his grievance that, he is in Jail for last more than 10 years as an under-trial prisoner and despite the said fact, his trial is not concluded. 2) In view of the above, we hereby direct the learned Special Judge, Thane seized of MCOC Special Case No.9 of 2008 to expedite the hearing of the said trial and if not concluded till date, to conclude it within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of the present Order, without seeking any extension in that behalf. 3) Petition is accordingly disposed off. ssm 2 901-wp37.19.doc 4) Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this Order to the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thane expeditiously by all possible modes. (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.)

(A.S. GADKARI, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 37 of 2019). ← Search more judgments