Mr.Sunil Narendranath More & Anr. v. Vatsa Corp.Ltd & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. The Constituted Attorney of the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. (P.D.KODE, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 appw3.10 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2010 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.85 OF 2005 Mr.Sunil Narendranath More & Anr. ....Applicant. Vs. Vatsa Corp. Ltd. & ors. ....Respondents Mr. N.D.Desai, CA of applicant present in court. Mr. Kiran Kulkarni, advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. P.A.Pol, PP for State. CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND P.D.KODE, JJ. DATED:- OCTOBER 6, 2010. P.C.
Operative part
The Constituted Attorney of the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue this application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. (P.D.KODE, J.)
(A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Oct 2010. The bench was A M KHANWILKAR, P D KODE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.