1. Gudimetla Naveen Kumar v. 1. State of Telengana

2. Mrs S.Maheshwari, D/o S. Somaiah W/o G.Naveenkumar (First Husband) Aged. 30 years, Occ. Pvt Employee R/o.'1 1-3-664i496, New Ashok Nagar SR Hospital, Parsigutta, Secunderabad ...Respondents Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC.No.2Ogl2022 on the file of the Learned 13th Additional Chief tVletropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in view of the settlement between the Petitioners and the Second Respondent here in and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice. l.A. Nos: 2 and 3 OF 2025 Between: trrlrs S.Maheshwari, D/o S. Somaiah Wo G.Naveenkumz r (First Husband) Aged. 30 years, Occ. Pvt Employee R/o.11-3-664/496, lrr wAshok Nagar SR Hospital, Parsigutta, Secunderabad ...Respondent i 'espondent No.2 AND 1 . State of Telengana, Rep by Public prosecutor High courl rf Telengana, Hyderabad.

2. Gudimetta Naveen Kumar, S/o Late G. Narasimha Agec 35 years, Occ. Pvt Service.

3. tr/rs Gudimetla Naga fvlaheshwari, W/o Late G.Naras r tha Aged. 56 years Occ. Housewife Both 1 and 2 R/o.H.No.'1479, Poineer Bazaar, Near Ya lav Sangam, Risala bazaar, Alwal Medchal -Malkajgiri Dist ...Respondent Petition under Section 359(6) of BNSS praying that ir the circumstances stated in the l\.4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition he High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/De-facto complainant z nd A-1 and A-2 to compound the offences in CC.No.209 of 2021 of WPS Nc,t :h Zone Begumpet, Secunderabad on the file of the 13th Additional Chief Ir/et opolitan tvlagistrate Hyderabad in view of the compromise between the partie,r and to record the compromise and be pleased to Pass such order or orde' as deemed fit and Proper in the interest of Justice. l.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 359(2) of BNSS praying that irthe circumstances stated in the l/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition .he High Court may be pleased to record the compromise between the petitionerl lefacto complainant and A-l and A-2 in CC.No.209 of 2022 on the file of the '3th Additional Chief Metropolitan [Vagistrate, Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearing upon perusing t re Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the argume ts of Sri I/.ANAND KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Addltional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of Sri G.Ravi Chandran, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DI,VI EADA l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.14272 of 20i r5 COMiI{ON ORDER This Crimrnal Petition is filed by the petitioners -accused Nos.1 and 2 under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 seekirr I to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.209 of 2022 r> r the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderab: 1, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498- \, 406, 504 and 506 of IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohi r tion Act, 1 961 .

2. lt is submitted by learned counsel app raring for the petitioners-accused Nos.1 and 2 as well as re r pondent No.2- de facto complainant that during pendency of the tr resent Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter ( nd accordingly, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 have been filed seeking 1< compound the offences and to compromise the matter in ttr r above C.C., respectively

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor h. s opposed the said compromise petitions. 2 LTD-J Ctt? lt)t) )0)i

4. Perused the affidavit filed by the de facto complainant in l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 which disclose that she has willingly consented for comprcnrise. Since the parties were will;ng to enter into compromise, they were given a Lrhance to settle the matter by appearing along with their respective counsel before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana vide order dated 04.1.1 .2025 passed by this Court. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee shall identify the parties and submit a report to that effect.

5. PurSuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties along with their respective counsel have appeared before the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana and the Secretary of the above said Authority identified the parties and submitted a report dated 17.11.2025 to that effect stating that the parties were identified and they have willfully and without any coercion entered into compromise as per the terms of compromise

6. ln view of the above, l.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings \ in\C.C.No.209 of 2022 on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, registered against the petitioners-accused 3 (t-1p !1) 71 )0)j Nos.1 and 2, are hereby quashed subject to the pet tioners-accused Nos.'1 and 2 paying an amount of Rs.5,000r- (Rupees Five , housand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to'the Telangana Bar Association, Hyderabad, within a period of three ( )3) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry 7 Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, sl- i ll stand closed. SD/. A.H.1; GOWRI SHANKAR ANT REGISTRAR t:'"' Scrroru oFFrcER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan magistrate at Hydr-' abad. 2. The Station House Officer, WPS Begumpet, NOrth Zone, iecunderabad. 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Sta e of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to SRI IM.ANAND KUIVAR, Advocate IOPUC] 5. One CC to SRI G.RAVI CHANDRAN, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies. A copy of the joint tt/lemo is enclosed herelv th Total Amount of Rs. '10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand only ) has been paid by Sri M.Anand Kumar, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed by ll e Hon'ble Court vide order dated 24.11.2025 as Rs.5,0001 ( Rupees Five thous and only ) to the "Telangana State Legal Services Authority, Hyderabad, and F s. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Ad\ )cates Association, Hyderabad and filed l\rlemo as proof of compliance USR No. 1,t t349 of 2025. NVB/SA \+- HIGH COURT DATED:2411112025 COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2 and 3 o12025 ln/And CRLP.No.14272 of 2025 yR {HE S Tl I Ol 9 7 JAI{ 2t}26 a i5. t],' ,'/ '. ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION rr ND l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2025 (^ *{e tr* l i I I r t %q, (cRrN{rNAL MISC. PETTTTON) (U/S.5aSBNS BEFORE TTIII HONOUR4BLE HIGH COURT OF LENGANA AT: HYDERABAD I.A No: iN CRLP No.: of Z02S of 2025 Between: 1) Gudimetla Naveen kumar s/o late G. Narasimha Aged: 35 years. Occ: Pvt scrvice 2) Mrs Gudimetla Naga Maheshr.vari Wo late G.Narasimha / Aged: 56 years Occ: housewife Both 1 and 2 R/o.H.No.1479, Poineer Bazaar, Near Yadav Sangam, fusala bazaar, Alwal Medchal - Malkajgiri Dist AND ... peritioners 1) State of Telengana Rep by Public prosecuror High court of Telengana, I-Iyderabad 2) Mrs S.Maheshr,vari D/o S. Somaiah Wo G.Naveenkumar (First Husband) Aged: 30 yrs, Occ: Pvt Employee Rl o.ll-3 -6641 496, Ner.v Ashok Nagar SR Hospital, Palsigutta, Secunderabad. .. Respondents Ncr,"r^ cn6c ,F?6C 4 UbL-l'^--J 2 JOINT COMPI1O MISE MEMO 2 It is s,b,itrecl that on a co,plaint ioctged by Seconcl Il rspondent u,ith the Police \\? S NorLh zone Begurnpet Secnncle.abad thcy h r re registerecr crirne \o: 160/l0l I against the pctitioncrs lor trre olre,ces : IIegcd U/s. 49g-A IPC, sec 3, 4 DP Aot later on policc filed charge sheet in r rc No.209 of 2022 v,l'rich is pending on the file of learnecl XIII ACMM FI1,cl,: abad. It is subrnitted that the issue is rnar-ital cliscorcl betrveer.r the ljrst petitioner and the second respondent. After: registering of crime, r re petitioner No;1 and the second respondent have settled thc issue anticab ..belrveen them by deciding to part \\'avs mutualy ancr they have alreadl,oL tained Divorce on consent in FCoP No; 495 of 2019 dated,20-6-2(23 by the leamecl 'rutual Judge Family court at Secunderabad ancl the seconci r: pondent has also coutacted second Lnariage subsequent to Divorce ancl lii, r.g r.r,ith her seconcl husband.

3. It is submitted that as the issue between thc parties is ah c rdy settled and as the provisions under Dp Act is non compoundabl: the parlies are approa.ching tl.ris I{onorable couft by fi ling the presen t quash petition to quash the CC on the basis of their compromise. +/* q6r$ 4;" D 3 It is thcrefore pral,ed that this Flonorable court may be pleased to record thc compromise between the parties here in and to quash cc No.209 /2022 on the tlle of the Leamed l3'r'Adall chief i\,lctropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabacl anil to pass such other order or orders as this Honorable coud may decm fit and- propcr in the inrerest oliustice. q$ S,6r! PETITIONERNo:2 Counsel for Respondent No.2 PETITIONER No: 1 Counsel for P6ti tioners %t*&{.^^i RESPONDENT No;2 IJyderabad Dated: .10.2025