2 Lissi Thomas v. High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. .....Respondent/ Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed herein the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein in the event of their arrest in Cr.No.34 of 2011 on the file of the Galiveedu Police Station, Galeveedu, YSR District. The Petition coming on for hearing and upon perusing the memorandum of grounds filed herein and order of High Court made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V.R Reddy Kovvuri Advocate for the Petitioners and of Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following. ORDER //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To:-
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kadapa.
The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Lakkireddipalli, Kadapa District.
The Station House Officer, Galiveedu Police Station, Galeveedu, Y.S.R. District.
One C.C. to Sri V.R Reddy Kovvuri Advocate (OPUC).
Two C.C.s. to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad (OUT)
One spare copy. Ags AGS Dt: 12/09/2011. HIGH COURT SGR J Dt: 12/09/2011 ORDER CRL.P. NO. 7958 of 2011 BAIL
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.