Chagantipati Nagaraju v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRLP .NO: 7003 of 2012 Between: Chagantipati Nagaraju s/o.Venkateshwar Rao @ Pullaiah .... Petitioner/ A1) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P.,Hyderabad. .....Respondent (Complainant) Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner (A1) in Crime No. 224 of 2012 of Nandigama P.S., pending on the file of Additional J.F.C.M., Nandigama, Krishna District for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC. and direct the respondent/police to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest; The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI M. CHALAPATHI RAO, Advocate for the petitioner, and of the Public Prosecutor for respondent, the Court made the following: Contd… … //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Contd.. To
#1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandigama, Krishna District.
#2. The 2nd Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhimavaram, W.G.District.
#3. The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nandigama, Krishna District.
#4. 2 CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P.Hyd. (O.UT) 5. One C.C.to Sri M.Chalapathi Rao, High court of A.P.Hyderabad. (OPUC)
6.one spare copy. HIGH COURT SGR.J DATED 27-09-2012 ORDER CRL.P.NO. 7003 OF 2012 ANTICIPATORY BAIL Bsr Dt. 27-9-2012 HIGH COURT SGR.J DATED 27-09-2012 ORDER CRL.P.NO. 7003 OF 2012 ANTICIPATORY BAIL
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 27 Sep 2012. The bench was SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.