✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Criminal Petition No. 10082 of 2011 · Andhra Pradesh High Court

Criminal Petition No. 10082 of 2011RAJA ELANGO

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is dismissed

Judgment

Petitioners-Accused Nos.2 to 5 have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the proceedings initiated against them in

Operative part

C.C.No. 382 of 2011 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Heard. Offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Since the material on record prima facie reveals allegations against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the trial. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the facts and circumstances of the case, the presence of the petitioners is dispensed with before the trial Court except the dates on which the learned Magistrate insists for their presence. With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions filed in this criminal petition, if any, shall stand closed.

20.10.2011 CHV ____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: With the above observation, the Criminal Petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — ss. 3, 4.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 10082 of 2011). ← Search more judgments