Nagar, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District v. Signatory)Kamala Nagar, Ananthapur
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 Jun 2004
- Bench
- G ROHINI
Provisions considered
Judgment
For the Respondent : MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (SC FOR CG) FOR R1 MR.ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA FOR R2 The Court made the following Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice) In view of the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transfer Case (Civil) No. 92-95 of 2002, dated 8th April, 2 0 0 4 (MARDIA CHEMICALS LTD v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS), challenge to the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, is not tenable and for that reason, relief prayed for cannot be granted. The Writ petition, therefore, is dismissed. W.P.M.P. also stands dismissed. 23rd day of June,2004 To ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
The Secretary, Finance and Planning, Union of India, New Delhi.
The Vice President, (authorized signatory) ING Vysya Bank Ltd., Kamala Nagar, Ananthapur.
2 C.D. copies.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 13, 14, 226; Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Interest Act, 2002; Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 23 Jun 2004. The bench was G ROHINI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.