Robertsonpet, Machilipatnam, Krishna District v. 611, Robertsonpet, Main Road, Machilipatnam, Krishna District
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Jul 2003
- Bench
- G ROHINI
Provisions considered
Judgment
M/s. Srilakshmi Enterprises a registered Partnership Firm Rep. by its Managing Partner, V. Muralidhara Rao, D.No. 11/606, Main Road, Robertsonpet, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Banking, New Delhi - 110 001. 2 ING Vysya Bank Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manger, 11-611, Robertsonpet, Main Road, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order of direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in enactment of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 as being without Legislative Competence and quash the consequential proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent under Sec. 13(2) of the said Act under Reference HYRO 15/2003 dated 21.7.2003 and pass such other order For the Petitioner: MR.A.RAMANARAYANA, Advocate For the Respondent : MR.A.RAJASHEKAR REDDY (SC FOR CG) FOR R1 MR.ADDEPALLI SURYANARAYANA FOR R2 The Court Made the Following : Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble the Chief Justice) In view of the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transfer Case (Civil) No. 92-95 of 2002, dated 8th April, 2 0 0 4 (MARDIA CHEMICALS LTD v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS), challenge to the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, is not tenable and for that reason, relief prayed for cannot be granted. The Writ petition, therefore, is dismissed. W.P.M.P. also stands dismissed. Sd/- XXX ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER To
The Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Banking, New Delhi.
The Branch Manager, Robertsonpet, Main Road, Machilipatnam, Krishna District. ING Vysya Bank Limited, 11-611,
3.2 C.D. copies.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 21 Jul 2003. The bench was G ROHINI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.