Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 380, 454
Judgment
ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohan Rao) This writ petition has been taken up by us as Habeas Corpus Writ Petition in view of the contents of the telegram received by this Court on 15.4.2010 complaining about the illegal detention of one Mikkili Vamsee Krishna. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, representing the learned Advocate General, who has taken notice on behalf of the respondents, has filed a counter affidavit sworn to by Sri N.Venkata Reddy, inspector of Police, I Town Police Station, Vijayawada, enclosing thereto copies of the F.I.R. and other relevant material. In para-3 of the counter affidavit, it has been stated that the alleged detenu has been apprehended by the police of Patamata Police Station, Vijayawada, on 19.4.2010 connection with Crime No.107 of 2010 under Sections 454, 380 I.P.C., and he has been produced before the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, on 20.4.2010, and judicial learned Magistrate remanded custody. the alleged detenu
In view of the averments coupled with the material enclosed, we are satisfied that this is not a case for issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus and hence further action in this matter is dropped. ____________________ JUSTICE D.S.R. VARMA _____________________________ JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHAN RAO
30.04.2010. Msr THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHAN RAO WRIT PETITION No.9426 of 2010
30.04.2010 (Msr)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.