3 The Superintendent of Police, Adilabad v. District Adilabad
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
In the result, the writ petition is allowed, at the stage of
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
Counsel for the Respondents: MR.P.VENKATA RAO The Court made the following : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION No.3274 of 2008 ORAL ORDER: (per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.S.R.VARMA) Heard both sides. This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the order, dated 25.06.2002, passed in O.A.No.5981 of 2002 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash or set aside the same holding it as erroneous and contrary to law. Learned Government for Services-I appearing for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the writ petition is squarely covered by the order, dated 03.12.2007, rendered by a Division Bench of W.P.No.14244 of 2007. this Court In fact, this Court following the judgment rendered by another Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.4424 of 2004 and batch, passed the final order in W.P.No.14244 of 2007, allowing the same on 03.12.2007. In view of the same, this writ petition is also liable to be allowed. In the result, the writ petition is allowed, at the stage of admission. However, there shall be no order as to costs. _______________ D.S.R.VARMA, J
19.06.2008 ______________ K.C.BHANU, J // TRUE COPY // ..... REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 1 The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Director General and Inspector General of Police, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3 The Superintendent of Police, Adilabad. 4 2CCs to Government Pleader for Services, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT) 5 2CD copies
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In the result, the writ petition is allowed, at the stage of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.