✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court · 11 Jul 2007

Patan Khadar Khan v. The Executive Officer-cum-Panchayat Secretary, Kovvur Grampanchayat, Kovur, Nellore District and 2 others

Writ Petition No. 13535 of 2003GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner, this Court is of the view that the proceedings dated 21-06-2003 are only notices under Sections 118 and 119 of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 and petitioner is always at liberty to offer his explanation to…
  • Para 44. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. It is made clear that the interim direction is directed to be continued pending consideration of the said explanation offered by petitioner. Dt.11-07-2007 GLV ________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA

Judgment

Petitioner states that he is having a valid licence issued by first respondent – Executive Officer-cum-Panchayat Secretary of Kovur Gram Panchayat, vide R.C.No.95/87, dated Nil.9/87, to carry on business in meat and fish. He further states that all of a sudden, first respondent issued two notices, dated 21-06-2003, cancelling his licence and further directed him to shift the said meat shop to a place where new building for fish and meat market was constructed by the Gram Panchayat.

2.

Having heard learned counsel for petitioner, this Court is of the view that the proceedings dated 21-06-2003 are only notices under Sections 118 and 119 of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 and petitioner is always at liberty to offer his explanation to the said show cause notices, instead he approached this Court and filed the present writ petition. Accordingly, I see no merits in this writ petition.

3.

However, as this Court on 09-07-2003 passed an interim order directing respondents not interfere with petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of selling fish and meat within Ward No.1 of Kovur Grampanchayat by permitting him to run the same as usual, it is suffice to direct petitioner to offer his explanation to the impugned show cause notices within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Operative part

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. It is made clear that the interim direction is directed to be continued pending consideration of the said explanation offered by petitioner. Dt.11-07-2007 GLV ________________________________ JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 — ss. 118, 119.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 11 Jul 2007. The bench was GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 13535 of 2003). ← Search more judgments