Sri Vasavi Educational Society, Tedepalligudem v. Kanumalla Gram Panchayat
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 21 Jul 2011
- Bench
- V V S RAO, RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Outcome
Dismissed
Following the same, the writ petition stands dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Sri Vasavi Educational Society, Tedepalligudem, Represented by its Secretary Ch.V.V.Subba Rao, S/o.late Subba Rao, aged 54 years, R/o.H.No.9-1-37, K.N.Road, Tadepalligudem .. Petitioner
And The Gram Panchayat, Tadepalli, represented By its Panchayat Secretary, Grade-I, Tadepalli, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District .. Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.3592 OF 2004
ORDER:
Operative part
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) The petitioner - Sri Vasavi Educational Society, Tadepalligudem, filed the instant writ petition being aggrieved by a demand notice dated respondent – Gram Panchayat, 14.11.2003 issued by the sole Tadepalligudem. The petitioner would contend that as per Rule 5(c) of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Building Rules, 1972 promulgated vide G.O.Ms.No.282, dated 12.03.1965, buildings used for educational and hostel purposes and for public libraries and public buildings used for charitable purposes of sheltering the destitute or animals are exempted from the house tax. The counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the respondent would submit that the question raised is squarely covered by a Full Bench judgment of this Court in Abyudaya Educational Society v. Kanumalla Gram Panchayat, Prakasam District[1], wherein it was held that after repeal of the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, the rules and statutory notifications get extinguished as if that Act never existed on the Statute Book unless the repealing Act provides otherwise. Therefore, the petitioner cannot claim exemption for payment of house tax. Following the same, the writ petition stands dismissed. If the petitioner had paid any amount towards house tax during the pendency of the writ petition, the same shall be given due credit while demanding the tax from the petitioner pendente lite and hereafter. There shall be no order as to costs. ________________ (V.V.S. RAO, J) ______________________________
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
21.07.2011 KH [1] 2006 (5) ALT 767 (F.B.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Following the same, the writ petition stands dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Act, 1964.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 21 Jul 2011. The bench was V V S RAO, RAMESH RANGANATHAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.