A.P.S.R.T.C v. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Anantapur
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as there
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as there are no merits. No costs. _________________________________ Justice N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO Dated 25-11-2010. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.23275 OF 2001 Dated 25-11-2010
Judgment
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.23275 OF 2001 ORDER: Heard the counsel for the respondents. No representation for the petitioner.
As can be seen from the award, there were no back wages and I find there was punishment of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect. In pursuance of the interim orders of this Court in W.P.M.P.No.29396 of 2001, the 2nd respondent is said to have been reinstated into service in 2001. It appears the 2nd respondent might have reached superannuation and the counsel is not able to say whether he is in fact retired or not.
Therefore, for the services rendered by him after reinstatement, he will be entitled for the salary and no back wages are granted.
Operative part
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as there are no merits. No costs. _________________________________ Justice N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO Dated 25-11-2010. Dvs HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.23275 OF 2001 Dated 25-11-2010
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as there
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 25 Nov 2010. The bench was N R L NAGESWARA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.