Nageshwar Rao & Ors. v. M.Mallesha & Anr.
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4873, 4874, 4875, 4877, 4879 & 4882 of 2012 Between: Nageshwar Rao and others And M.Mallesha and another The Court made the following: ..... PETITIONERS
RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4873, 4874, 4875, 4877, 4879 & 4882 of 2012
COMMON ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. I do not find any irregularity or illegality in the order of the Court below in condoning the delay in re-presentation of the case when it was returned. In fact, the revision petitioners have not appeared before the Court below prior to condonation of delay. The condonation of delay is the discretion of the Court below and it cannot be said that the discretionary power is arbitrarily exercised by the Court below. These Civil Revision Petitions are accordingly dismissed at the stage of admission. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. ____________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J Dated: 05.10.2012 Dsr
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.