The Commissioner' Survey 'Settlements v. Director SurveY and ua
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applicatioru, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. T. JAYASREE ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER '1. Two CCs to GP FOR…
Judgment
Cause title
SRI JU HINAND KUMAR SHAVILI ALISHETTY Mt NARAYANA wRtT PETITlo NNo: 19617 OF 2010 Between: ^ ,.,--^^+c and Land Records, AP Hyderabad- and Le 1- The Commissioner' Survey 'Settlements ;lfl ltffi .;s";;li:*i*f "3t$r*'i;,*3x'3r,?rin3::'#:Sibubnagar i.?fl '"'lr;;,;"it*:,lii;i$ffi :Hi%"^"J:'i}i111'J"?:?f'?i''il0'33.'Jo,, ' ' ' '- S. Stat" of A P' ' rep oy rts oYUr s(q' ...'ETITIONERS AND 1 Sri.K.lvlallesh, S/o K Balai Director SurveY and ua Sig, Vidvrnugri colonY-3 district 2. The AP Registrar Ad ministrative ni'd#,!:l"t*t{{:rfiJ,;.1Eyhfl; fffl{ii' KalwakurthY village ano Tribunal, Purani Haveli,. Hyderabad' rep'by its ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia PraYing that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writofCertioraricallingfortherecordsrelatingtotheordersoftheHon'bleAP Admn. Tribunal, Hyderabad passed in OA'No"1 241812009 and batch of APAT as being erroneous, illegal, and unreasonable and quash the same ,. A.No:2 OF 2 010 WPl,llP. NO 21299 OF 20 10 petition )r Section 151 CpC pravir und, in the affidavit filed n support grant leave to the 5 t, peritioner;;;;;:,:":::i:",- other petitioners r-'in against the orders o Hyderabad in OA.No 12418/2oos. ";"; ;;.;;,lu "r,;;;;":'',n^]n:.: ,, the circunstances srated me y be preased to - r-'uosrrr' w,t pe'ition along with oo Administ.ative rribunar, l.A No: 40F2010 . petition under Ii,ect p MP. No: 24869 o F2010 in the arridavft ,,,"0 ,,'."JrJ-'iJ," Jil::r:t;' ' the circums ances stared rn: Hish court mav te pteased to suspend the orders or r,. ap ^^::,^::l] ot Administrative Trib oA.No.1241B of 200g,o,.'u d 1s 2 2o1opendins r,.#:,?jff:;],,;:;'"' ," l.A. NO 10F 2010(WVM P. NO :52O2 oF 20 10) Between: AND 1
2. J.
4. 6 $r{ill".tns, ii";^ ?#'1:.,o'"t"evor. ( under termina rion } c,o.Assistant jffi v'; ; ;;7 .; I v-T "fl , r [3;ili', Y,?: #' :]?' i',1ii5''^]5 l* U: j:; "X ....PETITIONER
YRESPONDENT NO. 1 The, Commissioner Survey ,set ements and Land Records, Ap llyderabad_ The Chairman,& Diji..Selection Committee, Mahabubnagar_50900 1 l56od?,r, 5i:1$il'J':::"J;;'[',"S"311,i,i:fl 5?"",13.6$?:1'"*:e%,fl g::t:J*. colector. Member or oiii.sur.jJtiJr'1"o]i"iitt"" Maharrubnasar _ ...RESPONDENTS
M/RIT PET ITIONERS The AP Administrative Tribunal, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad, r'>p bv its Registrar ...RES,.NDENT/RES..NDENT in the circumstar 'ces stated igh Court may be Pleased to Petition under Se:tion 151 CPC praying that ;;;;;,;""t in srpport or the petition' the H in the i J vacate the interim order dated No. '19617 ot 2010
16.08.2010 in WPtvlP No. 24869 of 2010 in Wp Counsel for the Petitioner: Gp FOR SERVICES lt Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p.B. VIJAYA KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BI,E SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLI] SRI IUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA A]LISHETTY TVRIT PETITION N 0.19617 0F 201-0
ORDER:
(Per Hr,rlble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) When th<' matter is taken up for hearing, it is noti:ed that the present Writ t'etition is filed aggrieved b)' th" o':der' dated I I
79.O2.201O, pas;'=d in O.A'No.124118 oI 2009 by the Andlrra Pradesh Administrative lribunal, Hyderabad, and that the subjt'ct O'A' was I disposecl of alo n g with O.A.No s.12413, 11317, 11319' 124.1 4' 12475' .12416, 124-17, ] ] 318 and 11320 of 2009 and the State lr rs preferred Writ Petitions aLggrieved by the comrnon order passcc' ir.r the said O.As. ancl th t: same were dismissed as infructu' rus on the submission m,rde by the learned Government Pleade'r appearing for the petitiotr,:rs. Four of such Writ Petitions are W' )'Nos'17635' 17637, 17699 and. \7707 of 2010, which were dismissed as infructuous on 19.1.0.2022, 07.17.2022, 07'09'2022 arul 19j02022' respectively.
In vien,'tf the same, this Court is of the consider:d view that as the Writ Petitions preferred against the said O As 'vere already dismissed as infructuous, the present writ petition is also liable to be dismissed as infructuous.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Applicatioru, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// SD/. T. JAYASREE ISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER '1. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVTCES lt, High Courtforthe Stateof Tetangana, 2. One CC to SRl.P.B. VIJAYA KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl 3. Two CD Copies at Hyderabad [OUTI BM GJP HIGH COURT DATED:09101t2025 ORDER WP.No.19617 of 2010 .- ,., it . 'i) 1' 1,: 21 rPfl T6 c) |,_l r) .I- .,' {)'\t:i * r:o l/r'! '-l\1 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS Y
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.