D.Savithramma v. N.Chandra Sekhar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ss. 96, 151
Judgment
...Appellants/Defendants AND D.Savithramma, W/o.late D.Ram Reddy, Age:63 years, Occ: Housewife Ryo. Munipamula Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. RespondenUPlaintiff l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(CCCAMP. NO: 93 OF 2008 Between: D.Savithramma, W/o.late D.Ram Reddy, Age:63 years, Occ: Housewife R/o.Munipamula Village, Ramannapet Mandal, Nalgonda District. .. Petitioner/Respondent AND
N.Chandra Sekhar, S/o.late N.Raghuramulu, Age:4g years, Occ: Business, R/o,Tirumata Balaji, Opp. Tirumata futusic Centre,-Municipal Colony, M;i;kp"t: Hyderabad.
N.Arnarnath, S/o.late N.Raghuramulu, Age:3g years, Occ: gusiness R/o.1_ 10127110518, Ground Froor, opp. Tirumara Music centre, rr, lunrcipir coiony, Malakpet, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/petitioners/Appellants Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may oe pteiseJ vacate the interim order dated 22-1-2008 passed in c.a.c.A M.p.N6.eos lt zooi in C.C.C.A.No 359 ot 2001 . t.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(CC CAMP. NO: 965 OF 20 07l Petition under section r51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, [te Hign court may oe pteaseJio grant stay of execution of the decree in os No.12g of 2006 dated' 23-10-2007 on the file of the lll Additionar chief Judge, city civir court, Hyderabad penoinj disposal of the appeal. Counsel for the Appellants: Sri V VENKATA RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent: Sri V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDy The Court delivered the following: JUOGMENT l THE HON'BLE SRIIUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY C.C.C.A.No.359 OF 2007 IUDGMENT i (l'jer Hon'ble Sri Justice Abhinancl Kumar Shavili) I4rhen the matter is taken up for hearing, Iearned counser for the appellants has informed the Court that the appellants passed away and their legal representatives were not brought on record.
2. In view of the said submissions, the appeal stands abated, as the appellants passed away.
Accorclingly, the Appeal is clisrnissecl as abated. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending in this Appeal, shall stand closed. To, Sd/. M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER
1. The lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (with records, if any)
2. One CC to Sri V VENKATA RAMANA, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri V. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD CoPies Kam/DL HIGH COURT DATED:0210112025 JUDGMENT CGCA.No.359 of 2007 1lC, STA l€ ,.\( ) 1 B l'lAN 2116 |,1 * 9t'spat THE APPEAL IS DISMlSSED AS ABATED t(./
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.