✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

B. Sudershan v. Smt. G. Tra Bai

Civil Revision Petition No. 1853 of 2005P S NARAYANA2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
P S NARAYANA

Provisions considered

Judgment

1.

Smt. G. Tra Bai, W/o. Late T. Dharmas.

2.

G. Rakesh Kumar, S/o. Late T. Dharmas. (Both are R/o. 1-4-135, Bholakpur, Hyderabad.) Respondents The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and the order of the High Court dated 13-04-2005 made in C.M.P. No. 2488 of 2005 and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. P.V. Sanjeeva Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and there is no representation on behalf of the respondents, the Court made the following : ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The matter is coming up under the caption of final hearing. No representation on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that it is a reversing Order. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that an interim order had already been granted on 13-04-2005. The same is hereby extended by four more weeks. Post the CRP for final hearing after two weeks on the top of the list.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To

1. The Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, at Hyderabad 2. The 1st Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad 3. Smt. G. Tra Bai, W/o. Late T. Dharmas. 4. G. Rakesh Kumar, S/o. Late T. Dharmas. (Addressees 3 & 4 are R/o. 1-4-135, Bholakpur, Hyderabad.)

1. One Spare Copy USR HIGH COURT DATED : 05-07-2005 Note : Post the CRP for final hearing after two weeks on the top of the list. ORDER C.R.P. No. 1853 of 2005 Extending the Interim Order by Four more weeks. HIGH COURT USR DRAFTED ON : 06-07-2005 APPROVED ON : PSNJ DATED: 05-07-2005 Note : Post the CRP for final hearing after two weeks on the top of the list. ORDER C.R.P. No. 1853 OF 2005 Extending the Interim Order by four more weeks.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision Petition No. 1853 of 2005). ← Search more judgments