GULAB CHAND PUKHRAJ v. RB. JINENDER RAJ & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
HELD: As has been held in Boorgu Jagadeshwaraiah*, a landlord is not precluded to seek eviction of tenant from any non-residential building even if he is having another C non-residential building. The aspects of quality, size and suitability of the building cannot be out of consideration and doing so would be to frustrate the purposes of the Act. The Rent Contraoller would consider the objection of the tenant as well as the claim of the landlords. He may D permit the parties to lead additional evidence. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Rent Controller would decide the case as expeditiously as possible. [Para 9,15,17 and 18] [845-E-F-H; 846-A-B] ', , E
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.