Dr. M.Vijaya Gopal v. Incharge Drugs lnspector, Hayathnagar Zone

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in CC.No. 15 of 2011 on the file of the court of the First Additional Special Judge for SPE and ACB cases, Hyderabad including the personal appearance of the petitioner, pending disposal of the above criminal petition. l.A. NO: 5 OF 2020 Between: The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Special Public Prosecutor for Anti Conuption Bureau, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad, (Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Hyderabad, Range-ll, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT AND Dr. M.Vijaya Gopal, S/o Late M.Prakash Rao, Occ: Asr;r ;tant Director -lll and lncharge Drugs lnspector, Hayathnagar Zone, Ri/o H.No.1( -10-27112, Qtr. No.61, 2RT, Municipal Colony, Malakpet, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONEII ACCUSED OFFICER Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying tha stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, t pleased to vacate the interim order dated 1110712013 in Cd f extended by order dated 231O312020. n lhe circumstances re High Court may be .No.

6882 of 201 3 as I.A. NO: 4 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that n the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, t e High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order passed by this lon'ble Court dated 11.07.2013, 23.08.2013, 10.O7.2017, 19.02.2019, 201).2019, 25.10.2019, 23 12.201 9, 23.01.2020, 26.02.2020, 23.03.2020 and 20. 0.2021, 05.01 .2022, 25.01.2022, 09.06.2022, 07.O7.2022 and11l1Ol2O22 res 1 ectivety in Criminal Petition No. 6882 of 2013, until further orders. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusin(t the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Crimlnal Petition and upon hearing the argrt rents of Sri p GlRl KRISHNA, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri. T. Bala lv:han Reddy, Special Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of thG Sole Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER l' INTHE HIGH COTIRT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6882 of 2013 Date:01.12.2025 Between: Dr.M.Vijaya Gopal AND ...petrtloner The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Special Public Prosecutor, Anti Com; ption Bureau, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (Depury Superintendent of Police, Anti Com'lption Bureau, Hyderabad Range-II, Hyderabad) ...respondent ORDER This Criminal Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.lS ol 2011 on the file of leamed First Additional Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Hyderabad, wherein the petitioner was arrayed as accused for the offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(2) rlw 13(1Xd) of the Prevention of Comrption Act, 1988. 2

Heard Mr.P.Giri Krishna, leamed counsel for t le petitioner and Mr.T.Bala Mohan Reddy, leamed Speciat Publi: Prosecutor for: respondent.

During the course of hearing, it is brought to he notice ol this Court that C.C.No.15 of 2011, on the hle of tht: leamed First Additionat Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases. t yderabad, is coming up fol examination under Section 313 of the (l .P.(l

Learned counsel for the petitioner requested his Courl to dispense with the presence of the petitioner in C.C.l'1, ,.15 ol 201 l, and submitted that the petitioner will appear before tlrr leamed trial Couft whenever his physical presence is required.

Learned Special Public Prosecutor has not opposed the submission made by the leamed counsel for the petitic rer.

Taking into consideration the above submissi,l rs, this Courl is not inclined to quash the proceedings against the pe -itioner, since C.C.No.15 of 201 1 is coming up for examination unctr r Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. However, the presence of petitioner/ r ;cused before the learned First Additional Special Judge for SPE arr I ACB Cases, Hyderabad, in C.C.No.15 of 20ll is dispensed with, subject to the , condition that the petitioner/accused shall be represented by his counsel on every date of hearing, unless his presence is specifically required during the course of the trial. In the event of non- appearance on any date so fixed by the trial Court, the trial Court shall be entitled to proceed with the matter in accordance with law.