W.P No. 6079 of 2007 · Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 29 Mar 2007
- Bench
- GODA RAGHURAM
Provisions considered
- Essential Commodities Act, 1955 s. 6A(2)
Judgment
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 6079; 6080; 6081; 6082; 6179; 6188; 6189; 6190; 6191 & 6192 of 2007 Common Oral order: The issue involved in these writ petitions is one and the same and hence are being disposed of by this common order, after hearing the learned counsel for the respective petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. The petitioners assail the orders of the respective District Collectors directing interim disposal of petitioners’ scheduled commodities seized on allegations of violation of the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Dealers (Licensing & Distribution) Order, 1982 (for short ‘the Control Order, 1982’). Invariably, the reasons recorded in the impugned orders directing interim disposal is that the seized stocks of pulses are perishable in nature. In view of the judgment of this Court in W.P.No. 3761 of 2007 dated 27-02-2007, the competent authority, exercising power under Section 6A(2) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act’) is required to record an opinion/satisfaction as to the existence of the conditions incorporated in Section 6A (2) of the Act, as a condition precedent to an order directing interim disposal. Pulses seized in the instance cases are clearly not perishable commodities and therefore the orders are flawed, invite invalidation and are accordingly quashed. The respondents/competent authorities are however at liberty to pass appropriate orders exercising power under Section 6A (2) of the Act, in conformity with the principles laid down and the law declared in W.P.No. 3761 of 2007 dated 27-02-2007. The writ petitions are accordingly allowed. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated:29-03-2007 Pvks/*
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 — s. 6A(2).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Mar 2007. The bench was GODA RAGHURAM.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.