✦ Andhra Pradesh High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

Writ Appeals are dismissed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. The learned single Judge had elaborately considered both the questions of law and facts in detail. We do not find any reason warranting interference with impugned common judgment, passed by the learned single Judge. Of course, and furthermore, no decision, in fact, is necessary…

Judgment

ORAL COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.S.R. Varma) Heard both sides.

#2. Since all the abovementioned Writ Appeals are interrelated, the parties and the question involved being common, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

#3. Challenging the common order, dated 21.06.2006, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court, in Writ Petition Nos.11006 of 2006, 11381 of 2006 and 11575 of 2006, Writ Appeal Nos.749 of 2006, 750 of 2006 and 751 of 2006, respectively, are filed by the Government.

#4. We have perused the entire material, including the impugned common judgment, passed by the learned single Judge of this court, available on record.

#5. The learned single Judge had elaborately considered both the questions of law and facts in detail. We do not find any reason warranting interference with impugned common judgment, passed by the learned single Judge. Of course, and furthermore, no decision, in fact, is necessary in these Writ Appeals, at this stage, inasmuch as, the film – The Da Vinci Code, had already been released and exhibited and no untoward incident is reported to this Court. In view of the above, all the abovementioned Writ Appeals are dismissed. However, there shall no order as to costs. ______________________ D.S.R. VARMA, J 3rd JANUARY, 2007. ______________________ P. SWAROOP REDDY, J NOTE: After signing of this common judgment by DSRV,J &PSR,J and after dispatching the same, DSRV,J directs the Office to place one copy each of this common judgment in the respective original bundle of each application (which are disposed of by this common judgment) for ready reference and record purpose. PV (B/O)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Andhra Pradesh High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Appeal No. 749 of 2006). ← Search more judgments