✦ Telangana High Court

Sri T Vijaya Kishore v. INDIRA KUMARI, Advocate IOPUCI

No. 766 of 2006M LAXMAN

Case at a glance

Bench
M LAXMAN

Provisions considered

Judgment

Sri T Vijaya Kishore, S/o. late T. Radha Krishna Murthy, R/o.4-12-523, High Court Colony, Vanasthalipuram, Ranga Reddy District. ( SR dismissed for'default vide Court Order dated.21 .12.2011) ... (espondenUDefendanUPetitioner l.A. NO : 1 OF 2010(CRP MP. NO: 5971 O F 2010) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased grant interim stay of all further proceedings in o.S.No. 766 of 2006 on the file of the court of the ll Additional Senior civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar pending disposal of the above civil Revision Petition and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT R. V. INDIRA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent: ------------ The Court made the following: ORDER I,l THE E ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN ORDIR: C.R.P.No.4396 OF 2010

1. Leamed co rnsel for the revision petitioner reported ttrat the cause in the revis on petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, it may be d smissed as infructuous.

2. In the light of the above submission. the revision petition is dismissed as infiu:tuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

3. Pending mi cellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY/i Sd/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR l,\ _ sECTTON dtsrrCeA \ To

1.

The ll Additional I'enior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar.

2.

One CC to SMT. R, V. INDIRA KUMARI, Advocate IOPUCI 3. Two CD Copies 4. One Spare Copy MMK HIGH COURT DATED:0710112022 ORDER CRP.No.4396 of 2010 y.c S TA 1 I I () 15 TEB 2022 f \ ..: DISMISSING THE CIV L REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUSi 2o I

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Telangana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 766 of 2006). ← Search more judgments