Smt.Padmavathi v. M.Venkat Rao
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 16 Nov 2021
- Bench
- M LAXMAN
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ss. 96, 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY' Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER '1. The ll SeniorCir I Judge, CityCivil Court, Hyderabad 2. One CC…
Judgment
Cause title
Smt. Padmavathi, W/o. late Narayan Murthy, D/o.late Yashoda Bai, aged 60 years, Occ: Pensioner, R/o.4-1-735, Tuljaguda, Mazamjahi Market, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT
/PLAINTIFF AND
1. M.Venkat Rao, S/o.late M.R.Naidu, aged about 55 years, Occ: Service, R/o.Head of the Department, Political Science, Branben University, Branben, Candada. 2. The A.P. Co-operative Non-Gazetted Employees Association, rep. by its Geneal
3. Government of A.P., rep. by the District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad Secretary, Hyderabad. District. .,.RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT CMP. NO: 9732 OF 2001 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct all the parties to the OS No.222 of 1997 on the file of the Court of the Second Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and who are the parties herein, not to alienate or change the physical features of the property in question covered by Ex.A-1 and Ex.B-1 in the said Suit i.e, Land admeasuring 225 sq.yards, or '188.10 sq.metres. situated in ltilunicipal No.4-1-735 at Tuljaguda, l\rloazamjahi Market, Hyderabad City. Pending disposal of the instant regular appeal on the file of this Hon'ble Court and to pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and interest of justice. For the Appellant : SRI S.R.SANKU, Advocate (not present) Forthe Respondent No.1 : SRI P.NAGA PRADEEP, Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN CITY C] VIL COURT APPEAL NO.IOT OF 2OO1
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is posted for dismissa-l, there is no representation frc n the appellant.
Operative part
Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY' Sd/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER '1. The ll SeniorCir I Judge, CityCivil Court, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri S R.Sanku, Advocate (OPUC) - ^ 3. One CC to Sri P \aga Pradeep, Advocate (OPUU) 4. Two CD CoPies 5. One SPare CoPt. Kj. To ). HIGH COURT DATED:1611112021 d ..1 ,1 "\ a 15li-trifl JUDGMENT CCCA.No.101 of 200' DISMISSING THE At PEAL FOR NON.PROSECUTION. ?9/'.,Y 0b\
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — ss. 96, 151.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 16 Nov 2021. The bench was M LAXMAN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.