D. Krishna Mohan v. The Station House Officer, P.S. Maheswaram, Rangareddy District
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 29 Sep 2010
- Bench
- SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence, the petition is dismissed giving liberty to the
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Hence, the petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. questioning proceedings in the Criminal case pending before the Magistrate. _____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J. Date: 29-09-2010. DSH
Judgment
Cause title
The Station House Officer, P.S. Maheswaram, Rangareddy District, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High court of A.P., Hyderabad and another. --- Respondents
This Court made the following : HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10482 OF 2009
ORDER:
This petition is filed seeking quashing of F.I.R. in Crime No.42 of 2007 of Maheswaram police station, Rangareddy District. There is no dispute that charge sheet was filed in this matter before the Magistrate. So, it is for the petitioner, if advised, to file fresh petition for quashing proceedings in the pending Criminal case before the Magistrate. Thus, this petition has become infructuous.
Operative part
Hence, the petition is dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. questioning proceedings in the Criminal case pending before the Magistrate. _____________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J. Date: 29-09-2010. DSH
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, the petition is dismissed giving liberty to the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, on 29 Sep 2010. The bench was SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.