Konwledge City, Navi, lt4umbai, and its Circle Office at v. Gantla Shekar Reddy
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Accordinglr., C.R.P. is dismissed for non-pr: ;ecution. Therc shall be no order as Lo costs.
Judgment
Cause title
Petitioner/Petitioner/Defendant AND Gantla Shekar Reddy, S/o. Narasimha, Occ Cultivation, R/o. D.No.1-14, Peddakarpathy, Chityal Mandal, Nalgonda. Respo nd enURes pon d e nVP la in tiff I A NO: 1 OF 2012(CRPMP. NO: 4954 OF 2012\ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS.No.150 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Ramannapet, Nalgonda District pending disposal of the above revision. Counsel for the Petitione(s):SRl. S. Subba Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: None appeared The Court made the following. ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NANDIKONDA.IARSING RAO
ORDER:
C.R.P.No.3765 of 2Ol2 Whe n rhe matter was listed on 09 .O9.2O'.1 i. there \\ras no representation on behalf of the petitioncr and thc r the matter was directed to irr: listcd under the caption 'For Disrni i ;a1.'
Accordinglv, today '*'hcn thc matter \ Ias c I led, though lhc Court procecdings u'ere madc available in Hr I rid mode (both Virtual & Phvsical), there u'as no rcpresentat ( n on behalf of petitioner in the morning session and the matlet ras passed over to afLernoon session to givc a farr opportunity tc. he petitior-rcr tcr represent thr'ir case. hou, ever, u'hen the matter , 'as taken up in the afternoon session i.e., on 2:25 pm, none t rpezrred for the petitioner.
In vierv of the above, it appears that j :titioner is not interested to pursue Lhe matter, hcnce , this Co u rt hzrs no other option except to dismiss thc mat tcr for non-proscr rtion.
Accordinglr., C.R.P. is dismissed for non-pr: ;ecution. Therc shall be no order as Lo costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, f any pencling, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-A.H i,. GOWRT SHANKAR ASI; STANT REGISTRAR '.s.ECTtON OFFICER I I To,
The Junior Crvil Judge, Ramannapet. (with records if i ny) 2. One CC tc SP.l S.Subba F.edCy. A.Cvocate [OPUC] 3. Two Cd Copie"s HIGH COURT DATED:1 0/09/2025 ORDER CRP.No.3765 of 2012 Ir i] CIVIL REVISION P1;-]'II'IO\ IS I)ISNIISStiD FOR NON-PITOSI . -TI(]\ 5 \
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.