Mohammed ldris Mubeen v. Bandari Anil Kumar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- B R MADHUSUDHAN RAO
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
Petitioner
rDefendant No.4 AND i. G. Srty"narayana Reddy, S/o late Agi Reddy, Aged about 63 years, Occ: ' Retd. Emproyee, Rr/o e-1-33/20, Prasantinasat t"*.l.HJji;l,Jlil,T,11",o 2. Bandari Anil Kumar, S/o late Bandari Krishna, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Business, Rlo 12-2{i2310120r SBI Colony, Mehdipatnam' Hyderabad'
3. Bandari Arun Kumar, S/o late Bandari Krishna, Aged about 43 years, Occ: Business, No 12-2-8231C120, SBI Colony, Mehdipatnam' Hyderabad.
4. B. Archana @ Thota Pavani, D/o late Eandari Krishna, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Housewife , No 3-2-823111'1, ChappalEazar, Kacheguda' Hyderabad. ..,Respondents/Defendant Nos. I to 3 lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 qPC prayirE that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the proceedings in O.S.No.28O8 of 2020 on the file of Hon'ble lX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, till the pendency of the present revtsion. lA No: 2 QE2Q22 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 03-03-2o22 vide l.A 1,1o.337 of 2021 in o.s.No.2808 of 2O2O on the file of Hon'ble lX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, till the pendency of the present revision. Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr' Asad Hussain- counsel for the Respondents: None Appealed The Court made the foll'owing: ORDER I I THIE HON'BLT JUSTICE B.R. MADIIUSUDIIAN RAO CIVIL REVISION No.1O22 of 2or22
ORDER::
\ \ M.r.Asad Hussain, learned counsel for the \ petitiorrer/defendant No.4 on record submits that he has given rro objection to the party.
2. The present Civil Revision Petition arises out of the dismis, sal of an application filed under Order VII Rule 1.1 of CPC, on 03.03.2022, uide I.A.No.337 of 2O2L in O.S.No.2808 of 2O2O
3. Case status shorrn's that suit in O.S.No.2808 of 2O2O on the fiIe of learned tX Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad, is disposed of on 24.03.2025.ln view of the, sarne, the cause in this Civil Revision Petition does not srrrvive. / i : 2
Operative part
4. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
5. Interim order and miscellaneous petitions;' if any, pending in the Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. Sd/. A" SREENIVASA ASSISTAI.IT //TRUE COPY/ SECTION OFFICER To,
The lX Junior Civit Judge, City Civil Court, 2. OrVCC to Mr. Asad Hussain, Advocate IOPUCI 3. Two CD CoPies Kam/DL (Y \ \ HIGH COURT DATED t24l0gl2025 t y',,, ORDER CRP.No.1022 of 2022 2OJAt'l2M * * THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DIS}MISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS t : : ! i I 'i I I I I I I C) -@ ft- €
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.