Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- N V RAMANA
Outcome
Dismissed
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent 2 to 4 in not issusing Hall Tickets to the Candidates of the 1st & II nd year of Intermediate Course studying in the petitioner's College, in spite of the order of the 2nd Respondent in R.C.No.102/E3-4/93-94, dt.24.05.1999 have been stayed by the 1st Respondent as per order in Letter No.17137/CE.III.1/99-1, dt.23.6.1999 is arbitrary, unjust and consequently direct the Respondent 2 to 4 issue Hall Tickets to all the students of the petitioner College Studying in the 1st & 2nd year Intermediate Course and permit them to appear for Examination through the petitioner's College, by implementing the order of the 1st Respondent in letter No.17137/CE.III.1/99-1, dt.23.6.1999. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Operative part
None appears for the petitioner. It is represented by the learned Government Pleader that in view of the interim orders dated 07-10-1999, passed by this Court in W.P.M.P. No. 26282 of 1999, no orders need be passed in this writ petition and that it has become infructuous. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. ________________ N.V. RAMANA, J June 15, 2005 MRR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SECTION OFFICER Copy to. – 1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Education (CE.III) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2 The Commissioner & Secretary, Board of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 3 The Controller of Examinations, Board of Intermediate Education, Nampally, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. 4 The Regional Inspection Officer, Board of Intermediate Education, Rajahmundry, West Godavari district. Two C.C. s to the G.P. for Higher Education, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT) Two C.D. Copies.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.